Legal Opinion

Art Metal Works, Inc. v. Auto Match Corp.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided January 8, 1930PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOOLSEY, District Judge.

The defendant’s motion for an injunction pendente lite is denied.

I. At the argument I denied the plaintiff’s motion to strike out the counterclaim for unfair competition.

As for jurisdiction over the subject-matter, there is the necessary diversity of citizenship and the necessary jurisdictional amount alleged to be involved.

As the counterclaim is one which might have been the subject-matter of an independent suit in equity against the plaintiff, Equity Rule 30 (28 USCA § 723), it is properly pleaded in this case. Vacuum Cleaner Co. v. American Rotary Valve Co. (D. C.)…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Boston Diatite Co. v. Florence Manufacturing Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
  2. Kelley v. Ypsilanti Dress-Stay Manuf'g Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Michigan · 1890
  3. Virtue v. Creamery Package Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1910
  4. Kidd v. HorryUnited States Circuit Court · 1886
  5. Buffalo Specialty Co. v. VancleefDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1914

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Magnetic Engineering & Mfg. Co. v. Dings Magnetic Separator Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1950
  2. General Electric Co. v. Fan-Steel Products Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API