Legal Opinion
Loken v. Magrum
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided January 7, 1986No. Civ. 10996PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
YANDE WALLE, Justice.
Ardell Loken appealed from a summary judgment of the district court dismissing with prejudice his complaint against A.C. Transport, Ltd., and Lloyd C. Magrum because Loken’s cause of action was barred by the statute of limitations. We reverse.
Loken’s complaint alleged that Magrum was an agent for A.C. Transport and was driving its semi-truck and trailer when his negligence caused a collision with Loken’s pickup on February 9, 1978, near Glen Ul-lin, North Dakota. Magrum and A.C. Transport are Canadian and nonresidents of North Dakota. Pursuant to Section 39-01-11,…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Couts v. RoseOhio Supreme Court · 1950
- Ruggles v. KeelerNew York Supreme Court · 1808
- Connecticut Trust & Safe Deposit Co. v. WeadNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
- Mack v. MendelsNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Bode v. FlynnWisconsin Supreme Court · 1934
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Bottineau Farmers Elevator v. Woodward-Clyde Consultants, a Foreign CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
- Amerada Hess Corp. v. ConradNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
- Estate of Zins Ex Rel. Kelsch v. ZinsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
- Treiber v. Citizens State BankNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. DuncanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.