Mack v. Mendels
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtLehman, J.
On the 29th day of May, 1918, the defendant made, executed and delivered a note for the sum of five thousand dollars payable to the order of Clarence C. Perpall at 50 Broad street, New York city. At that time the defendant was a “ curb broker,” having an office at 50 Broad street, New York city, where the note was made payable, but resided in New Jersey. The ■ note was delivered as additional margin to Clarence C. Perpall & Co., a firm of brokers who were members of the Consolidated Exchange, and with whom the defendant was then doing business. Clarence C. Perpall & Co. became bankrupt. The…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Olcott v. . the Tioga Railroad CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
- National Surety Co. v. RuffinNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
- Connecticut Trust & Safe Deposit Co. v. WeadNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
- Burroughs v. BloomerNew York Supreme Court · 1848
- Hart v. . KipNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- The SydfoldCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1936
- Turner v. American Metal Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1944
- King v. ChmielewskiNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
- Dunning v. DunningNew York Court of Appeals · 1950
- Corash v. Texas Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1942
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.