Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Stephan v. Finney

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 27, 1994No. 69,616PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Lockett, J.:

In accordance with Senate Resolution 1844, dated March 30, 1993, the Attorney General filed this mandamus and quo warranto action to determine the Governor’s authority to negotiate compacts with Indian tribes which authorize casino gambling or other Class III gaming on Indian lands which is not specifically authorized by Kansas statute or by the Kansas Constitution. Respondent removed the matter to the federal courts. The federal court subsequently remanded the action to this court.

After remand, at a prehearing conference the parties agreed…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Donaldson v. HinesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1947
  2. State Ex Rel. Stephan v. FinneySupreme Court of Kansas · 1992
  3. Hull v. . RugglesNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
  4. Hunt v. EddySupreme Court of Kansas · 1939
  5. Higgins v. Cardinal Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1961

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Kansas Public Employees Retirement System v. Reimer & Koger Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1997
  2. State Ex Rel. Clark v. JohnsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Hodes & Nauser, MDS, P.A. v. SchmidtSupreme Court of Kansas · 2019
  4. In Re Tax Application of Lietz Constr. Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2002
  5. State Ex Rel. Six v. Kansas LotterySupreme Court of Kansas · 2008

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API