Legal Opinion

Higgins v. Cardinal Manufacturing Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 17, 1961No. 42,055PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Schroeder, J.:

The question presented by this appeal is whether an “agency shop” provision in a labor contract is prohibited by the so-called “right to work” law of Kansas. The appellants are nonunion employees covered by the applicable collective bargaining agreement and brought this action to enjoin application of the contract, and to secure a declaratory judgment of the court to determine the validity of the “agency shop” provision in the contract. The appellees by cross appeal challenge the jurisdiction of the court under the National Labor…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. San Diego Building Trades Council v. GarmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  2. Garner v. Teamsters, Chauffeurs & Helpers Local Union No. 776Supreme Court of the United States · 1954
  3. Radio Officers' Union of the Commercial Telegraphers Union v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  4. Williams v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  5. Weber v. Anheuser-Busch, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Leek v. TheisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1975
  2. Wolf v. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident AssociationSupreme Court of Kansas · 1961
  3. State Ex Rel. Tomasic v. UNIFIED GOV. OF WYANDOTTE COUNTY/KANSAS CITYSupreme Court of Kansas · 1998
  4. Solomon v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 2015
  5. State Ex Rel. Stephan v. FinneySupreme Court of Kansas · 1994

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API