Legal Opinion

Star Houston, Inc. v. Kundak

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 10, 1992No. B14-91-01304-CVPublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CANNON, Justice.

This is an appeal of a judgment in an action under the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices-Consumer Protection Act (“DTPA”). A jury found that Star Motor Cars (“Star”) had committed knowing violations of the DTPA and awarded the Kun-daks actual damages, additional damages, and attorneys’ fees. Star appeals. We affirm.

In 1984, the Kundaks bought a new Mercedes from Star. Over the next four years, Star serviced the car some forty-four times. The Kundaks were dissatisfied with the car and Star’s maintenance. They filed suit under the DTPA against Mercedes, Inc. and Star on…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. In Re King's EstateTexas Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Stewart Title Guaranty Co. v. SterlingTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  3. White v. Southwestern Bell Tel. Co., Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Porras v. CraigTexas Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Pope v. MooreTexas Supreme Court · 1986

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Torres v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2002
  2. Brandon v. American Sterilizer Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1994
  3. Petri v. GatlinDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1997
  4. Sierad v. Barnett, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2005
  5. Mauricio Rodriguez Celis v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2011

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API