Star Houston, Inc. v. Kundak
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CANNON, Justice.
This is an appeal of a judgment in an action under the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices-Consumer Protection Act (“DTPA”). A jury found that Star Motor Cars (“Star”) had committed knowing violations of the DTPA and awarded the Kun-daks actual damages, additional damages, and attorneys’ fees. Star appeals. We affirm.
In 1984, the Kundaks bought a new Mercedes from Star. Over the next four years, Star serviced the car some forty-four times. The Kundaks were dissatisfied with the car and Star’s maintenance. They filed suit under the DTPA against Mercedes, Inc. and Star on…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- In Re King's EstateTexas Supreme Court · 1951
- Stewart Title Guaranty Co. v. SterlingTexas Supreme Court · 1992
- White v. Southwestern Bell Tel. Co., Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1983
- Porras v. CraigTexas Supreme Court · 1984
- Pope v. MooreTexas Supreme Court · 1986
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Torres v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2002
- Brandon v. American Sterilizer Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1994
- Petri v. GatlinDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1997
- Sierad v. Barnett, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2005
- Mauricio Rodriguez Celis v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2011
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.