Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Cunningham v. Lucci, Unpublished Decision (9-8-2006)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided September 8, 2006No. 2006-L-052UnpublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM OPINION

{¶ 1} The instant action in mandamus is before this court for consideration of the motion to dismiss by respondent, Judge Eugene A. Lucci, of the Lake County Court of Common Pleas. In support of his motion to dismiss, respondent contends that the petition filed by relator, Selvin R. Cunningham, is barred for a multitude of reasons and therefore fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. For the reasons that follow, we agree with respondent and dismiss relator's petition.

{¶ 2} On November 2, 2005, relator was indicted on the following: one count for failure to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Keenan v. CalabreseOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Gaskins v. ShiplevyOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  3. State ex rel. Sawyer v. O'ConnorOhio Supreme Court · 1978
  4. State Ex Rel. Carr v. InderliedOhio Court of Appeals · 2000
  5. State ex rel. Baker v. SchiemannOhio Supreme Court · 1993

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Verbanik v. Bernard, 2006-T-0080 (4-16-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. State Ex Rel. Appenzeller v. Mitrovich, 2007-L-125 (11-16-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. State ex rel. Ames v. Baker, Dublikar, Beck, Wiley & MathewsOhio Court of Appeals · 2022
  4. State Ex Rel. Feathers v. Badger, 2006-P-0093 (6-22-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
  5. State ex rel. Gould v. GibsonOhio Court of Appeals · 2013

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API