Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Carr v. Inderlied

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided March 13, 2000No. 99-G-2236PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

This action in mandamus is presently before this court for final determination of respondents’ separate motions to dismiss, filed respectively on July 16 and August 12, 1999. As the primary basis for their motions, both respondents, Linda Wagoner and Judge H.F. Inderlied, Jr. of the Geauga County Court of Common Pleas, maintain that the dismissal of the case is warranted under Civ.R. 12(B)(6) because the petition of relator, Arthur Carr, fails to state a viable claim in mandamus. For the following reasons, we conclude that both motions have merit.

Relator is presently an inmate at the Belmont…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. State Ex Rel. Cunningham v. Lucci, Unpublished Decision (9-8-2006)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API