Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Baker v. Schiemann

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided October 13, 1993No. 93-908PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals. The trial court has ordered the relief appellant seeks. If he is dissatisfied, he may appeal. Mandamus is not a substitute for appeal. State ex rel. Pressley v. Indus. Comm. (1967), 11 Ohio St.2d 141, 40 O.O.2d 141, 228 N.E.2d 631, paragraph three of the syllabus.

Judgment affirmed.

Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State ex rel. Pressley v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1967

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State Ex Rel. Cunningham v. Lucci, Unpublished Decision (9-8-2006)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2006