Legal Opinion
United States v. Cesar Ubaldo
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 9, 2017No. 14-50093PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RAWLINSON, Circuit Judge:
Cesar Ubaldo (Ubaldo) appeals his conviction after he was found guilty by a jury of illegally importing weapons into the United States in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 371, 922(0, 924(a)(1)(C), and 22 U.S.C. §§ 2778(b)(2). 1 Ubaldo makes the following arguments on appeal:
1. The substantive offenses charged, violations of § 992(í) and § 2778(b), do not apply extraterritorially.
2. The evidence was insufficient to establish that Ubaldo caused the ille gal importation of weapons into the United States.
3. His motion to suppress should have been granted because the…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Burrage v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2013
- RJR Nabisco, Inc. v. European Cmty.Supreme Court of the United States · 2016
- United States v. WiseCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- United States v. Marciano VasquezCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2018
- United States v. Lidia RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- United States v. Javier PerezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- United States v. Ahmed AlahmedalabdaloklahCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023
- Bruce Kriegman v. 1127477 Alberta Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.