Legal Opinion
J. A. Herzog v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 11, 1955No. 14611_1PublishedCited by 49 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BYRNE, District Judge.
Appellant J. A. Herzog operated a Pontiac agency dealing in both new and used cars. His principal business appears to have been the wholesaling of used cars to other used car dealers. Most of Herzog’s car sales were handled through two employees, Douglass and Cline, who received the money from the sales and purportedly turned it over to Herzog or his office manager.
In March of 1954 Herzog was indicted on three counts charging wilful attempted income tax evasion. 1 He was found not guilty on counts one and two relating to 1947 taxes, and guilty on count three relating to…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Screws v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- United States v. AtkinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Nye & Nissen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- Meyer Harris Cohen, AKA Michael 'Mickey' Cohen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
- C. O. Hanson v. Shell Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
- Kathleen Troupe v. Chicago, Duluth & Georgian Bay Transit CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
- Lowell Lyons v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
- J. A. Herzog v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.