Legal Opinion

State v. Aschnewitz

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided April 14, 1992No. C7-91-1108PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NORTON, Judge.

This is an appeal from Herman Aschnew-itz’s conviction for driving with an alcohol concentration of .10 or more. Appellant challenges the trial court’s failure to suppress the results of a blood test.

PACTS

On January 28, 1991, appellant was involved in a single car accident where his vehicle went off the road in Monticello, Minnesota. When a police officer arrived at the scene of the accident, he detected the odor of alcohol on appellant’s breath.

Appellant was taken to the hospital where the officer read him the implied consent advisory. Appellant consented to a urine…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Tyler v. Commissioner of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  2. State v. AguirreSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  3. State v. ScottCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
  4. State v. PittmanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  5. State v. HalversonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. SchauerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
  2. State v. ArdsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2012
  3. State v. FlermoenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010
  4. STATE, CITY OF BELLE PLAINE v. StradcutterCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997
  5. Jason Richard Montonye v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API