Legal Opinion

STATE, CITY OF BELLE PLAINE v. Stradcutter

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided September 9, 1997No. C3-97-373PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NORTON, Judge.

The state argues that the district court erred in suppressing the results of respondent’s Intoxilyzer test because respondent did not have a right to consult with counsel before taking the test. Because respondent was read the implied consent advisory, he had a right to consult with counsel prior to taking the test. We affirm.

FACTS

On May 12, 1996, at approximately 1:00 a.m., Officer Phil Nawrocki observed a vehicle drive through a stop sign and commit several other traffic violations in Belle Plaine, Minnesota. Nawrocki initiated a traffic stop and identified the driver…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. Joon Kyu KimSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
  2. Friedman v. Commissioner of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
  3. State v. OthoudtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
  4. Dynamic Air, Inc. v. BlochCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
  5. State v. CondonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. SletteCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API