STATE, CITY OF BELLE PLAINE v. Stradcutter
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NORTON, Judge.
The state argues that the district court erred in suppressing the results of respondent’s Intoxilyzer test because respondent did not have a right to consult with counsel before taking the test. Because respondent was read the implied consent advisory, he had a right to consult with counsel prior to taking the test. We affirm.
FACTS
On May 12, 1996, at approximately 1:00 a.m., Officer Phil Nawrocki observed a vehicle drive through a stop sign and commit several other traffic violations in Belle Plaine, Minnesota. Nawrocki initiated a traffic stop and identified the driver…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State v. Joon Kyu KimSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
- Friedman v. Commissioner of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
- State v. OthoudtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
- Dynamic Air, Inc. v. BlochCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
- State v. CondonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. SletteCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998