Legal Opinion
Replogle v. Kirby
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided January 3, 1921No. 1327PublishedCited by 5 opinions
Appeal from the Commissioner of Patents. Interference proceeding between Daniel Benson Replogle and James B. Kirby, as assignee of Shujei Noguchi. From a decision of the Commissioner of Patents, awarding priority to Noguchi, Replogle appeals.
1Opinion of the Court
VAN ORSDEL, Associate Justice.
Appeal by Replogle from the decision of the Commissioner of Patents awarding priority to Noguchi for an invention relating to dust collectors for pneumatic cleaning devices as defined in the following count:
*863“A porous paper bag adapted to be secured to the discharge pipe of a pcnumatie cleaner, in combination with a mesh bag adapted to loosely envelop the paper bag, and means for securing the bags to the discharge pipe.’’
[1] Noguchi was granted a patent May 9, 1916, upon an application filed May 1, 1914. Replogle filed his application July 5, 1916. It will be…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Chapman v. WintroathSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
3Cited by5 opinions
- Chapman v. BeedeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1924
- Replogle v. RayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- American Laundry Machinery Co. v. Prosperity Co.District Court, N.D. New York · 1923
- Kirby v. ReplogleCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1921
- Splitdorf Electrical Co. v. Webster Electric Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1921