Legal Opinion
American Laundry Machinery Co. v. Prosperity Co.
District Court, N.D. New York
Decided July 23, 1923No. 417PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
COOPER, District Judge.
Motion is made to dismiss the bill of complaint on the ground that:'
“It does not appear from any allegations in the [amended] bill of complaint that, more than two years prior to the date of filing of the alleged divisional application No. 334,785, of the Andree patent in suit, No. 1,379,601, the alleged inventions of said patent (a) were not in public use or on sale in this country ; (b) were not patented or described in any printed publication in this or any foreign country.”
The complaint makes the proper and usual averments in .these respects, so far as the prior or…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Chapman v. WintroathSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Splitdorf Electrical Co. v. Webster Electric Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1921
- Wells v. HonigmannDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1920
- De Ferranti v. HarmattaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1921
- Replogle v. KirbyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1921
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Mumm v. Jacob E. Decker & SonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Webster Electric Co. v. Splitdorf Electrical Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Southgate v. GreeneCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1932