Sechler v. Krouse
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSweeNey, J.
In 1913, the General Assembly enacted former G. C. 1465-86 (103 Ohio Laws 88) which, in describing the continuing jurisdiction of the Industrial Commission to change or modify its former orders or findings regarding claims for benefits under the Workers’ Compensation Act, provided that “the powers and jurisdiction of the board over each case shall be continuing.”
However, in 1931, the General Assembly introduced a time limitation by providing that the commission lacked jurisdiction to change its former orders or findings where the date of the last payment of compensation or benefits (or, in…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Gregory v. FlowersOhio Supreme Court · 1972
- Kinney v. Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1975
- Emmons v. KellerOhio Supreme Court · 1970
- Kittle v. KellerOhio Supreme Court · 1967
- Fleischman v. FlowersOhio Supreme Court · 1971
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Felske v. DaughertyOhio Supreme Court · 1980
- State ex rel. Romans v. Elder Beerman Stores Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 2003
- Clifford v. DaughertyOhio Supreme Court · 1980
- Chatfield v. Whirlpool Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2021
- Cocherl v. Ohio Dept. of Transp., 06ap-1100 (6-26-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.