Robinson v. Joseph
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Defendants met their prima facie burden of showing that plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury to her cervical spine and lumbar spine by submitting the affirmations of a physiatrist and neurologist, both of whom found that plaintiffs cervical spine and lumbar spine demonstrated full ranges of motion in every plane, comparing plaintiffs values to normal (see Perl v Meher, 18 NY3d 208 [2011]; Vega v MTA Bus Co., 96 AD3d 506, 507 [1st Dept 2012]; Spencer v Golden Eagle, Inc., 82 AD3d 589, 590-591 [1st Dept 2011]). Contrary to plaintiffs contention, it was unnecessary, for defendants to meet…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Perl v. MeherNew York Court of Appeals · 2011
- Spencer v. Golden Eagle, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Alexandre v. DweckAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Clemmer v. Drah Cab Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Fuentes v. SanchezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Levinson v. MollahAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Crewe v. PisanovaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- Angeles v. American United Transportation, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Angeles v. American United Transportation, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- CREWE, ARIANE v. PISANOVA, TATJANAAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.