Legal Opinion

Alexandre v. Dweck

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 2, 2007PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants Freida Dweck and Accutime Watch Corp. appeal, and the defendant Hann Auto Trust separately appeals, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Jackson, J.), dated January 5, 2006, as denied their respective cross motions for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them on the issue of liability and on the ground that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d).

Ordered that the order is affirmed…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Alvarez v. Prospect HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. Coscia v. 938 Trading Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  3. Sayers v. HotAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Rouach v. BettsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  2. Alvarez v. DematasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  3. Encarnacion v. SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  4. Smith v. QuicciAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  5. Reynolds v. Wai Sang LeungAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API