Fuentes v. Sanchez
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
*419Defendants met their initial burden by submitting the affirmed reports of their orthopedist and neurologist finding normal ranges of motion in the cervical and lumbosacral spine and the left knee, and concluding that symptoms in those parts of the body had resolved, as well as the MRI reports of their neuroradiologist concluding that the MRI films of the cervical spine, lumbosacral spine, and left knee revealed degenerative changes and no evidence of posttraumatic injuries related to the accident (see Torres v Triboro Servs., Inc., 83 AD3d 563 [2011]). Contrary to plaintiffs’ contention, the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Toure v. Avis Rent a Car Systems, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2002
- Perl v. MeherNew York Court of Appeals · 2011
- DeJesus v. PaulinoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Canelo v. Genolg Transit, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Torres v. Triboro Services, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Malupa v. OppongAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Henchy v. VAS Express Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Brand v. EvangelistaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Holmes v. Brini Transit Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- McArthur v. Act Limo, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.