Legal Opinion

Clemmer v. Drah Cab Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 24, 2010PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Howard H. Sherman, J.), entered May 20, 2008, which granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d), affirmed, without costs.

The failure of defendants’ medical experts to discuss plaintiffs *661medical records indicating bulging or herniated discs does not require denial of defendants’ motion (.DeJesus v Paulino, 61 AD3d 605, 607 [2009]; Shumway v Bungeroth, 58 AD3d 431 [2009]), since, contrary to plaintiffs contention,…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Toure v. Avis Rent a Car Systems, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2002
  2. Gaddy v. EylerNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. Licari v. ElliottNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. Pommells v. PerezNew York Court of Appeals · 2005
  5. Thompson v. AbbasiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Malupa v. OppongAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  2. Barry v. AriasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  3. Rosa-Diaz v. Maria Auto Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  4. Lam v. DongAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  5. Henchy v. VAS Express Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API