Legal Opinion
Rabinowitz v. Oates
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided September 30, 1996No. Civil Action CCB-94-2898PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
BLAKE, District Judge.
Plaintiff Burton Michael Rabinowitz has sued his employer, Digital Equipment Corporation (“Digital”), for defamation, and two of his supervisors, Michael Cates and Anthony Morris, for defamation and conspiracy. Plaintiff Barbara Rabinowitz has sued defendants for loss of consortium as a result of the defamation of her husband, Mr. Rabinowitz. Defendants dispute the claims and have filed a motion for summary judgment, which has been fully briefed. For the reasons that follow, the motion will be granted.
BACKGROUND
Mr. Rabinowitz, Mr. Oates, and Mr. Morris…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Garrison v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Jacron Sales Co. v. SindorfCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1976
- Alexander & Alexander Inc. v. B. Dixon Evander & Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
- Marchesi v. FranchinoCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Derek Harvey v. CNNCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2022
- Doe v. Johns Hopkins Health System Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 2017
- Henderson v. Claire's Stores, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2009
- Mazer v. Safeway, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2005
- Ransom v. Baltimore CountyDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2000
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.