Legal Opinion

United States v. Univis Lens Co.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided September 17, 1941PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GALSTON, District Judge.

The complaint charges violations of Secs. 1 and 3 of the Sherman Anti-Trust Act, 15 U.S.C.A. §§ 1, 3, and alleges that the Univis Lens Co., Inc. (which will hereafter be referred to as the Lens Company), manufactures bifocal lenses pursuant to an unlawful combination and conspiracy in which the Univis Corporation is accused of having unlawfully set up a system of price control through the issuance of licenses to the Lens Company and others and by means of so-called fair trade agreements to certain wholesalers and retailers; that such lenses are covered by patents owned…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. United States v. Colgate & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1919
  3. United States v. Trans-Missouri Freight Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1897
  4. Apex Hosiery Co. v. LeaderSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  5. Dr. Miles Medical Co. v. John D. Park & Sons Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States v. Univis Lens Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Quanta Computer, Inc. v. LG Electronics, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
  3. United States v. United States Gypsum Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 1946
  4. Lifescan Scotland, Ltd. v. Shasta Technologies, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
  5. United States v. Univis Lens Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1950

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API