Legal Opinion
United States v. Univis Lens Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided February 10, 1950PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GALSTON, District Judge.'
It is charged by the petitioner that the respondents have violated the Final Judgment entered in this court on September 28, 1942, in an action wherein The Univis Lens Company (hereinafter referred to'as Univis) and others were adjudged to have violated sections 1 and 3 of the Sherman Anti-Trust Act, 15 U.S.C.A. §§ 1, 3. The Government filed its petition in procuring an order to show cause why the respondents should not be adjudged and held in criminal and civil contempt on the ground that since the early part of October 1942 they combined and conspired with wholesale…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Gompers v. Bucks Stove & Range Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Direct Sales Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Michaelson v. United States Ex Rel. Chicago, St. P., M. & OR Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Federal Trade Commission v. Beech-Nut Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- United States v. PattenSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- The Flintkote Company, a Corporation v. Elmer Lysfjord and Walter R. Waldron, Doing Business as Aabeta Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
- United States v. HallCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1952
- Hawaii Public Employment Relations Board v. Hawaii State Teachers Ass'nHawaii Supreme Court · 1974
- The Flintkote Company, a Corporation v. Elmer Lysfjord and Walter R. Waldron, Doing Business as Aabeta Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
- United States v. HallCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1952