Legal Opinion
Lasalle National Bank v. Shook
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided November 20, 2001No. AC 21281PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MIHALAKOS, J.
The defendants1 Winthrop C. Shook and Janice C. Shook appeal from the judgment of strict foreclosure rendered by the trial court in favor of the plaintiff, LaSalle Bank National Association.2 On appeal, the defendants claim that the court improperly granted the plaintiffs motion for summary judgment because genuine issues of material fact existed with respect to their three special defenses. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The pleadings, affidavits and other documentary information presented to the court reveal the following facts. On July 1, 1997, the defendants…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Hamm v. TaylorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Farmers & Mechanics Savings Bank v. SullivanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Southbridge Associates, LLC v. GarofaloConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
- Petterson v. WeinstockSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1927
- City of Danbury v. Dana Investment Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- GMAC Mortgage, LLC v. FordConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
- LaSalle National Bank v. Freshfield Meadows, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- Bank of New York v. ConwayConnecticut Superior Court · 2006
- Serrano v. BurnsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- Cross v. O'neil, No. Cv 02 0189033 (Dec. 6, 2002)Connecticut Superior Court · 2002
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.