Heavner v. Town of Lincolnton
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtBeogdeN, J.
The questions of law, as stated in the brief of the appellant, are as follows:
1. Is the North Carolina Workmen’s Compensation Act a constitutional and valid enactment of law?
2. Is the North Carolina Industrial Commission, as created and established, a constitutional and legitimate tribunal with power and authority to hear and pass upon the facts and law in the above entitled cause?
At the outset the plaintiff asserts that under the statute of distribution, C. S., 137, subsection 3, she would be entitled to one-half of the proceeds arising from the death of her son unless the general statute of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- New York Central Railroad Company v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Mountain Timber Company v. State of WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Arizona Employers' Liability CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Hawkins v. BleaklySupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- In Re HayesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Richardson v. North Carolina Department of CorrectionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1996
- Hanks v. Southern Public Utilities Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
- State Ex Rel. Unemployment Compensation Commission v. BarberSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
- Lee v. . American Enka Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
- McCune v. Rhodes-Rhyne Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.