Mogle v. Hunt
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
CARY, P.
J.-—The plaintiffs, husband and wife, brought this action against defendants to recover for injuries received in a collision between plaintiffs’ automobile and defendants’ truck. A jury returned a verdict against defendant Vernon P. Hunt and from the resulting judgment this appeal is prosecuted.
Defendants contend as ground for reversal: (1) that plaintiffs’ recovery is barred by their contributory negligence, and (2) that certain errors in instructions were prejudicial.
The facts follow. The accident took place on the outskirts of the city of San Bernardino. Tippecanoe Avenue runs…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Darling v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1925
- Townsend v. ButterfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- Vedder v. BireleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
- Flores v. FitzgeraldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- Wirthman v. IsensteinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Nitta v. HaslamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934