Legal Opinion
Shepherd v. Deitsch
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York
Decided March 9, 1905PublishedCited by 2 opinions
In Equity. On final hearing.
1Opinion of the Court
HAZEL, District Judge.
This suit is brought by the patentee upon a bill which alleges infringement of United States letters patent No. 601,405, issued March 29, 1898, to Robert B. Shepherd, which relates to brushes wherein the back is reticulated, or perforated, the openings or slots extending through the back of the brush between the bristles substantially at right angles to the plane of the back, “so that the brush may be readily cleaned and maintained *84in a clean condition.” The defenses are anticipation, noninfringe.ment, and nonjoinder of necessary party complainant.
The first point for…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Waterman v. MacKenzieSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Gayler v. WilderSupreme Court of the United States · 1851
- Winans v. DenmeadSupreme Court of the United States · 1854
- Hapgood v. HewittSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Oliver v. Rumford Chemical WorksSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In re PullianDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1909
- Overman Cushion Tire Co. v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1932