Legal Opinion

In re Pullian

District Court, E.D. Tennessee

Decided February 18, 1909No. 889PublishedCited by 9 opinions

In Bankruptcy. On petition of Froneberger Mills & Co. and others to dismiss the proceedings.

1Opinion of the Court

SANFORD, District Judge.

The material facts are these: The bankrupt in April, 1907, filed a voluntary petition in bankruptcy, and was adjudged a bankrupt on the same day, but did not apply for or obtain a discharge in such proceeding. In January of this year the bankrupt filed the present voluntary petition in bankruptcy, listing with the petition 24 creditors with claims amounting to a little over $500. In this list are 21 creditors, including Froneberger Mills & Co. and the three other present petitioners, who were listed for the same claims in the former cause; there being listed in the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Kuntz v. YoungCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1904
  2. In re FiegenbaumCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1903
  3. In re KufflerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1907
  4. In re FahyDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1902
  5. In re BramlettDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1908

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Bacon v. Buffalo Cold Storage Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1912
  2. In re CooperDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1916
  3. Adams v. McClendonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
  4. In re McMorrowDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1931
  5. In re WestbrookDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 1911

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API