Legal Opinion

Connors v. United Metal Products Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 24, 1941No. 32,608PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Stone, Justice.

In April of 1934, plaintiff sustained an injury compensable under the workmen’s compensation act. Defendants, employer and insurer, acknowledged liability and for long paid weekly compensation, plus a substantial bill for medical and hospital expense. October 30, 1935, defendants, asserting that plaintiff had recovered, served notice of discontinuance, and accordingly discontinued payments to plaintiff. Not satisfied, lie demanded additional payments. Apparently in compromise of a disputed claim, plaintiff offered to accept additional compensation to August 1, 1936.

His…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Montgomery v. GrenierSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
  2. Maffett v. Citizens BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1936

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hodge v. HodgeDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 1979
  2. Hillmeyer v. WatzCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API