Connors v. United Metal Products Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Stone, Justice.
In April of 1934, plaintiff sustained an injury compensable under the workmen’s compensation act. Defendants, employer and insurer, acknowledged liability and for long paid weekly compensation, plus a substantial bill for medical and hospital expense. October 30, 1935, defendants, asserting that plaintiff had recovered, served notice of discontinuance, and accordingly discontinued payments to plaintiff. Not satisfied, lie demanded additional payments. Apparently in compromise of a disputed claim, plaintiff offered to accept additional compensation to August 1, 1936.
His…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Montgomery v. GrenierSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
- Maffett v. Citizens BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hodge v. HodgeDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 1979
- Hillmeyer v. WatzCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987