Legal Opinion

Hillmeyer v. Watz

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided November 17, 1987No. C6-87-1239Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PARKER, Judge.

This case arises from Paul Hillmeyer’s allegation that he mistakenly settled a disputed claim with Nicholas Watz by paying *90$11,827.50 to satisfy an uncovered, $20,000 check issued to satisfy a debt that existed between Watz and Patrick Delare. Hill-meyer alleged the check was a forgery, but settled the claim nonetheless. Watz moved for summary judgment and asserted the affirmative defense of accord and satisfaction. The trial court granted the motion, holding there was no genuine issue of material fact in dispute. We reverse.

FACTS

Paul Hillmeyer, a farmer in Cokato,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. BiesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
  2. Theis v. TheisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
  3. Sisco v. PaulsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
  4. Connors v. United Metal Products Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API