Montgomery v. Grenier
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Two actions in the district court for Ramsey county to recover a balance upon promissory notes. The answer admitted the execution of a promissory note, bnt alleged that the note was without consideration. By consent the cases were tried together before Brill, J. At the close of the testimony defendants’ motion to dismiss the cases was granted. From an order denying plaintiff’s motion for a new trial, he appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
Separate actions were brought by plaintiff, one against W. J. Montgomery and one against Elizabeth Grenier, to recover upon certain promissory notes made and delivered by defendants to plaintiff, and as both actions involved the same transaction, they were consolidated in the court below and tried together. At the conclusion of the trial the actions were dismissed, and plaintiff appealed from an order denying a new trial.. The facts are as follows: Hugh Montgomery, for many years theretofore a resident of St. Paul, died in that city on July 6, 1907, leaving a last will and testament, in and…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Prater v. MillerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1854
- Bellows v. SowlesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1883
- Anderson v. NystromSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
- Neibles v. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1887
- Crawford v. EngramSupreme Court of Alabama · 1908
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Kam Chin Chun Ming v. Kam Hee HoHawaii Supreme Court · 1962
- Warner v. WarnerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1938
- Bryant v. BryantSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
- Snyder v. CearfossCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1947
- State v. BiesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.