Legal Opinion

Maffett v. Citizens Bank

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 18, 1936No. 31,042PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Holt, Justice.

Defendants appeal from the order vacating and setting aside a judgment rendered in the district court upon an award of the industrial commission.

On March 7, 1932, Avhile in the employ of the defendant bank, plaintiff suffered an accidental injury. Compensation was applied for and paid by the employer or its insurer for some time. After notice of discontinuance of payments was given plaintiff by the employer, the parties, on November 7, 1933, entered into a stipulation Aidiereby plaintiff Avas to receive a lump sum as “full and final” settlement of any claim that might arise…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Rosenquist v. O'Neil & PrestonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
  2. Macknick v. Switchmen's UnionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
  3. Johnson v. JeffersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
  4. Falconer v. Central Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1935
  5. Dorfman v. Fremont Construction Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1935

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Radzak v. Mercy HospitalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
  2. Tankar Gas, Inc. v. Lumbermen's Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
  3. Connors v. United Metal Products Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API