Legal Opinion

Isbell v. Kaiser Foundation Health Plan

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided March 8, 1993No. 64192PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

Intervenor-appellant Ohio Department of Human Services (“ODHS”) appeals from a judgment of the trial court granting a directed verdict in favor of defendants-appellees Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, Kaiser Foundation Hospitals and Ohio Permanente Medical Group (collectively, “defendants”) and dismissing ODHS’s complaint for subrogation.

Plaintiffs Bonnie Sue and Danny Isbell filed a complaint in the trial court against defendants for medical malpractice and loss of consortium February 4, 1991. ODHS subsequently filed a motion to intervene as an additional plaintiff asserting statutory…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ruta v. Breckenridge-Remy Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1982
  2. O'Day v. WebbOhio Supreme Court · 1972
  3. North Coast Cookies, Inc. v. Sweet Temptations, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. Tyrrell v. Investment Associates, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. HensgenOhio Supreme Court · 1970

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Fields v. Stange, Unpublished Decision (3-11-2004)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2004
  2. State v. HallOhio Court of Appeals · 2001
  3. In re Forfeiture of Property of RhodesOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
  4. Valentine v. Ppg Industries, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2001
  5. State v. RayOhio Court of Appeals · 2019

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API