Legal Opinion

Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Hensgen

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 22, 1970No. 69-259PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam *

Defendant contends first that plaintiff seeks to hold defendant liable for the negligence of defendant’s employee Benvie, that Benvie is dead and any liability of his estate is barred by “the statute of limitations” (apparently R. C. 2117.06, 2117.07 and 2117.37, sometimes referred to as the nonclaim statutes), and that therefore plaintiff cannot recover from defendant.

For the purposes of this opinion and since no party has contended otherwise, we will assume that, if legal proceedings against Benvie’s estate by Lovett or his subrogee are barred by a statute of limitations, an…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Globe Indemnity Co. v. SchmittOhio Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Maryland Casualty Co. v. Frederick Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1944
  3. General Excavator Co. v. JudkinsOhio Supreme Court · 1934

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Chemtrol Adhesives, Inc. v. American Manufacturers Mutual InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Bogan v. Progressive Casualty InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Mills v. Whitehouse Trucking Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Laura Hayden v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1974
  5. State v. JonesOhio Supreme Court · 1980

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API