Legal Opinion

Myers v. McHenry

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 26, 1990No. 702PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MONTEMURO, Judge:

Appellants Theresa and Richard Myers (Myerses) bring this appeal from a grant of summary judgment in favor of defendant-appellees Barbara and Daniel McHenry, Robert Glunk, Bernard Rell and Century 21 Rell Real Estate. The Myerses brought this action against appellees, alleging fraud and misrepresentation on the part of the defendants with respect to the Myerses’ purchase of the McHenrys’ home. Relying on the case of LeDonne v. Kessler, 256 Pa.Super. 280, 389 A.2d 1123 (1978), the trial court concluded that the parol evidence rule would bar testimony at trial regarding…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Neuman v. Corn Exchange National Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  2. Bardwell v. the Willis CompanySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  3. LeDonne v. KesslerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  4. Woodward v. DietrichSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  5. Glanski v. ErvineSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Blumenstock v. GibsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  2. Sunquest Information Systems, Inc. v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1999
  3. Baker v. Cambridge Chase, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  4. Iron Worker's Savings & Loan Ass'n v. IWS, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  5. M & M REALTY CO. v. Eberton Terminal Corp.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1997

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API