Legal Opinion
Hiller v. State
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided December 4, 1914PublishedCited by 20 opinions
Appeal from the Criminal Court, of Baltimore City. (Heuisler, J.) The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.
1Opinion of the CourtBurke, J.
In the year 1827, the Mayor and City Council of Baltimore passed the following ordinance (Ho-. 17, approved March 2, 1827) :
“Any person who shall fish, hunt, pitch quoits, or money, fly a kite, play bandy or ball, or any other game or sport upon the Sabbath Day within the limits of the City, shall for each offense pay a fine of one dollar: and any ordinary or public garden keeper who shall suffer or allow in or upon Ms premises any kind oí game or sport on the Sabbath Day shall for every individual so permitted to offend pay ten dollars.”
The ordinance has ever since remained in force and…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Stone v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Mayor of Baltimore v. RadeckeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1878
- State v. HymanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1904
3Cited by20 opinions
- McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Farley v. GraneyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1960
- Davis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1944
- Maryland State Board of Barber Examiners v. KuhnCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1973
- Levering v. Park CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1919
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.