Maryland State Board of Barber Examiners v. Kuhn
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the CourtLevine, J.
We are concerned here with the constitutionality of a statutory scheme which permits barbers to cut the hair of both men and women, but restricts cosmetologists, 1 such as appellees, to cutting the hair of women. We thus focus on two statutory provisions. Maryland Code (1957, 1973 Supp.) Art. 43, § 529 (a), under the subtitle, Cosmetologists, currently provides:
“(a) The term ‘beauty culture’ includes any and all work done for compensation by any person which work is generally and usually performed by so-called hairdressers, cosmetologists, cosmetologists aides, cosmeticians, beauticians or…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Reed v. ReedSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Lindsley v. Natural Carbonic Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Mugler v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Frontiero v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by59 opinions
- Ashish Patel, Anverali Satani, Nazira Momin, Minaz Chamadia, and Vijay Lakshmi Yogi v. Texas Department of Licensing and RegulationTexas Supreme Court · 2015
- Attorney General of Maryland v. WaldronCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
- Attorney General v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
- Hornbeck v. Somerset County Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1983
- Governor of the State v. Exxon Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.