Legal Opinion

United States v. Fuld

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided May 23, 1913No. 959; No. 960; No. 979PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, Abstract 29228 (T. I). 32081').

1Opinion of the CourtDe Vries, Judge

This record contains three appeals from a single decision of the Board of General Appraisers, two of which raise the same issue for two different firms, and the third presents a separate issue of one of the same firms. Three distinct issues are presented:

I

The first question raised in all the appeals is the claimed insufficiency of the protests as multifarious. This objection concedpdly is as to their form. This claim was not urged before the Board of General Appraisers, and is .for the first time urged in this court.

- Inasmuch as we overruled the appeal of the importer on other grounds it is…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Miller v. ThompsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
  2. Henderson v. ShermanMichigan Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Bell v. ToddMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
  4. Overton & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912
  5. United States v. Brown, Durrell & Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1903

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. United States v. BurneCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
  2. United States v. VictorUnited States Customs Court · 1948
  3. Cross Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1916
  4. United States v. WymanCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
  5. U. Fujita & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1938

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API