Legal Opinion

U. Fujita & Co. v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided February 7, 1938No. 4077PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHatfield, Judge

This appeal from a judgment of the United States Customs Court brings before us four protests, three of which were dismissed by that court as being legally insufficient — two (Ijos. 551525-G and 552561-G) on motion by counsel for the Government, and one (No. 586142-G) *65■sua sponte. The issue raised by the appeal in the fourth protest, No. -669121-G, involves the proper classification of certain “door knockers,” which; together with many other imported articles, were stipulated by •counsel for the parties to be composed “in chief value of base metal not plated with gold or silver, and not…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Arthur v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Davies v. ArthurSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  3. United States v. SalambierSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  4. Carter v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1910
  5. United States v. Sheldon & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1914

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Garod Radio Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1961
  2. Estee Lauder Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API