State v. Webber
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtYoung, J.
Defendant appeals his convictions for taking a game mammal in a closed season and for wasting a game mammal. ORS 496.992; OAR 635-65-750(2); OAR 635-65-760(8). 1 He assigns error to the trial court’s refusal to instruct the jury that he had an absolute constitutional right to kill the deer if it was reasonably necessary for the protection of his property and to instruct the jury on the “choice of evils” defense. We affirm.
Defendant produces cattle and hay on his ranch in eastern Oregon. The ranch is near forest land that abounds with game animals, especially deer. There has been a history of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. DelgadoOregon Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. MatthewsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
- Van v. Travel Information CouncilCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
- State v. OlsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
- State v. ShawCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Richard P. Christy Thomas B. Guthrie Ira Perkins v. Donald P. Hodel, Secretary of the Interior United States Department of InteriorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- State v. MilesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
- State v. McPhailCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
- State v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023
- United States v. DarstDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1989
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.