Legal Opinion
Van v. Travel Information Council
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided May 26, 1981No. CA 18553PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGillette, P. J.
This is a proceeding pursuant to ORS 183.400(1). Petitioners 2 challenge that portion of an administrative rule adopted by the Travel Information Council which limits the right to erect temporary political signs on land adjacent to a state highway to a period of sixty days preceding an election. OAR 733-20-050(3)(a), infra. Petitioners claim that the rule violates the First Amendment and the equal protection clauses of both the Oregon and United States Constitutions. We agree and therefore declare the rule invalid. ORS 183.400(4). 3
Before turning to an examination of petitioners’ specific…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. O'BrienSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Collier v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1993
- Outdoor Media Dimensions Inc. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
- City of Antioch v. Candidates' Outdoor Graphic ServiceDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1982
- Ackerley Communications, Inc. v. Multnomah CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
- Goward v. City of MinneapolisCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.