Legal Opinion
United States v. Darst
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided November 15, 1989No. 89-10041-01PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
CROW, District Judge.
The case comes before the court on the defendant’s appeal of his conviction of taking migratory birds, in particular great horned owls, in violation of 16 U.S.C. § 703 and 50 C.F.R. § 21.11. Defendant’s appeal of his conviction before the Magistrate is subject to the same scope of appeal rules governing an appeal of a district court judgment to a court of appeals. Rules of Procedure for the Trial of Misdemeanors before United States Magistrates, Rule 7(e). The court will decide the case on the briefs, as the legal issues have been adequately addressed…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Missouri v. HollandSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Richard P. Christy Thomas B. Guthrie Ira Perkins v. Donald P. Hodel, Secretary of the Interior United States Department of InteriorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- United States v. Gerald L. RichardsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1978
- Mountain States Legal Foundation v. HodelCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1986
- United States v. BlanketDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1975
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Sierra Club v. MartinDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1996
- United States v. Robert Waites GuthrieCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1995
- United States v. JacobsDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1993