Legal Opinion

Thomas v. Tennessee Department of Human Services

District Court, M.D. Tennessee

Decided June 23, 2022No. 3:21-cv-00426Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION AMANDA THOMAS, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) NO. 3:21-cv-00426 v. ) JUDGE RICHARDSON ) TENNESSEE DEP’T OF HUMAN ) SERVICES, ) ) Defendant. ) ) ) MEMORANDUM OPINION Pending before the Court is Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 9, “Motion”), supported by an accompanying Memorandum of Law. (Doc. No. 10).1 Plaintiff filed a response (Doc. No. 16, “Response”), and Defendant filed a reply (Doc. No. 20, “Reply”). For the reasons stated herein, Defendant’s Motion will be GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. FACTUAL…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
  5. National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 2002

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API