Legal Opinion
Philadelphia Taxi Ass'n v. Uber Technologies, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided November 3, 2016No. CIVIL ACTION No. 16-1207PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
Juan R. Sánchez, District Judge
Uber Technologies, Inc. moves to dismiss Plaintiffs’ Amended Complaint, which asserts an attempted monopolization claim in violation of federal antitrust law and state law claims of unfair competition and tortious interference with present and prospective contractual relations. Since Uber entered the Philadelphia taxicab market in 2014, Plaintiffs—the Philadelphia Taxi Association, Inc. along with about 80 transportation and taxi companies—have experienced significant decreases in demand for their services and, in turn, their investments and earnings.…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Fowler v. UPMC SHADYSIDECourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
- Associated General Contractors of California, Inc. v. California State Council of CarpentersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Philadelphia Taxi Association v. Uber Technologies IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018
- Aaron Vilcek v. Uber Technologies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2018