Legal Opinion

Aaron Vilcek v. Uber Technologies, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided August 30, 2018No. 17-2724PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BENTON, Circuit Judge.

Four taxicab drivers sued Uber Technologies, Inc., in Missouri state court, individually and for a putative class. They alleged tortious interference with a valid business expectancy and sought damages. After Uber removed the case, the district court dismissed for failure to state a claim. Vilcek v. Uber USA, LLC , No. 4:15CV1900 HEA, 2016 WL 8674064 , at *4 (E.D. Mo. Sept. 30, 2016). The drivers appeal. Having jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , this court affirms.

I

In September 2015, Uber began offering rides for hire in St. Louis. About two months later, the drivers…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Western Blue Print Co. v. RobertsSupreme Court of Missouri · 2012
  2. Christiansen v. West Branch Community School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012
  3. Stehno v. Sprint Spectrum, L.P.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2006
  4. Central Trust and Investment Company v. SignalPoint Asset Management, LLCSupreme Court of Missouri · 2014
  5. Carter v. St. John's Regional Medical CenterMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. BlueLine Rental, LLC v. RowlandDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2020
  2. Conklin Fangman Kansas City LLC v. General Motors LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 2021
  3. Control Technology & Solutions, LLC v. Omni Energy Partners, LLC, et al.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 2026
  4. Dean v. Norfolk Southern Railway CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2023
  5. Emerson v. Capital One, NADistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2021

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API