Legal Opinion
Philadelphia Taxi Association v. Uber Technologies Inc
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided March 27, 2018No. 17-1871PublishedCited by 45 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RENDELL, Circuit Judge:
*336 Philadelphia taxicab drivers, aggrieved by the influx of taxis hailed at the touch of an app on one's phone, brought this antitrust action to protest the entry of Appellee Uber Technologies, Inc. ("Uber") into the Philadelphia taxicab market. The Philadelphia Taxi Association ("PTA"), along with 80 individual taxicab companies (collectively, "Appellants"), appeal the District Court's dismissal of their Second Amended Complaint ("SAC") alleging one count of attempted monopolization under Section 2 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 2 , and seeking injunctive relief and…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Associated General Contractors of California, Inc. v. California State Council of CarpentersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- Gennadiy Nekrilov v. City of Jersey CityCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2022
- Host International Inc v. MarketPlace PHL LLCCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2022
- In re: Suboxone Antitrust v.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2020
- In re Generic Pharm. Pricing Antitrust Litig.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2018
- Anoush Cab, Inc. v. Uber Tech. Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2021
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.