Legal Opinion

Loveridge v. Coles

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 26, 1898No. Nos. 10,949-(59)PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal by defendant from an order of the district court for Washington county, Williston, J., denying the motion of plaintiff, as administratrix of the estate of Nancy J. Loveridge, deceased, for a new trial.

1Opinion of the CourtStart, C. J.

This action was originally commenced by Nancy J. Loveridge to recover from the defendant the amount of two promissory notes dated October 7, 1895, for $400 each, made by the defendant to her.

The answer admitted the execution of the notes, and alleged that at the time of making them, and as a part of the same transaction, and as a consideration therefor, the payee of the notes executed to the defendant her bond for a deed, whereby she agreed- to sell to him the land therein described, and covenanted for herself, her heirs and personal representatives, upon payment of the two notes and one…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Harvey v. MorrisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1876
  2. Heavner v. MorganWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Robb v. MontgomeryNew York Supreme Court · 1822
  4. Runkle v. JohnsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1863
  5. Luse v. ReedSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Paynesville Land Co. v. GrabowSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
  2. Buswell v. O. W. Kerr Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
  3. Semmler v. Beulah Coal Mining Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1922
  4. True v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
  5. Snortum v. SnortumSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API