Legal Opinion

Belas v. Melanovich

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 31, 1977No. 738PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SPAETH, Judge:

This appeal arises from an attachment execution proceeding on a judgment recovered in a trespass action brought by Rosemarie Belas, a minor, and Rose Belas, her mother, against Craig Calabria, in which State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company and The Aetna Life and Casualty Company are named as garnishees. A jury returned a verdict of $32,180.30 against both garnishees; by agreement this was molded so that it was against State Farm for $25,000 and against Aetna for the balance. The lower court denied State Farm’s motion for judgment n. o. v., and State Farm has appealed. 1

I

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Dillon v. LeggCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Tobin v. GrossmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
  3. Esmond v. LISCIOSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  4. Brower v. Employers' Liability Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  5. Eldridge v. MelcherSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1973

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. CummingsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  2. Federal Kemper Insurance v. NearySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  3. State Farm Mutual Insurance v. JudgeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  4. Insurance Co. of North America v. State Farm Mutual InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  5. Adamski v. MillerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API