Belas v. Melanovich
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
SPAETH, Judge:
This appeal arises from an attachment execution proceeding on a judgment recovered in a trespass action brought by Rosemarie Belas, a minor, and Rose Belas, her mother, against Craig Calabria, in which State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company and The Aetna Life and Casualty Company are named as garnishees. A jury returned a verdict of $32,180.30 against both garnishees; by agreement this was molded so that it was against State Farm for $25,000 and against Aetna for the balance. The lower court denied State Farm’s motion for judgment n. o. v., and State Farm has appealed. 1
I
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Dillon v. LeggCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Tobin v. GrossmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
- Esmond v. LISCIOSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
- Brower v. Employers' Liability Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
- Eldridge v. MelcherSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. CummingsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Federal Kemper Insurance v. NearySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- State Farm Mutual Insurance v. JudgeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Insurance Co. of North America v. State Farm Mutual InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Adamski v. MillerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.