Legal Opinion

Weyant v. Kristy

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided January 18, 2011No. AC 31667PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

2Per curiam

The plaintiff, Patricia A. Weyant, appeals following the trial court’s denial of her motion to set aside the verdict, rendered after a jury trial, in favor of the defendant, John M. Kristy. On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the court abused its discretion in denying her motion to set aside the verdict. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

The jury reasonably could have found the following facts. On February 18, 2006, at approximately 7 p.m., the defendant was traveling in his car on Dunbar Road in Milford. The defendant approached a stop sign at the intersection of Dunbar Road…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Sturgeon v. SturgeonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
  2. Costanzo v. GrayConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
  3. In Re Upset Tax Sale, September 13, 2006Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2009

4Cited by2 opinions

  1. R.I. Pools, Inc. v. Paramount Concrete, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2014
  2. Lachira v. SuttonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API