Legal Opinion

Lachira v. Sutton

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided May 28, 2013No. AC 34266PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

DiPENTIMA, C. J.

The plaintiff Minerva Lachira1 appeals from the denial of her motion to set aside the jury’s verdict in favor of the defendants James J. Sutton (Sutton) and Stanford Guy Sutton, executor of the estate of Stanford H. Sutton.2 On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the trial court abused its discretion in denying her motion to set aside the verdict. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

The jury reasonably could have found the following facts. The relationship between the plaintiff and her landlord, Stanford H. Sutton, which had begun in 1999, was fraught with conflict.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. BrownSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
  2. State v. HammondSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
  3. Bernier v. National Fence Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
  4. Mlynar v. A. H. Merriman & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
  5. Lessow v. SherrySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1947

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. RomanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API